Corporate Governance Report
New Clicks Holdings is committed to effective corporate governance to
ensure that the interests of the company and its stakeholders are paramount.
Consequently, the group subscribes to the principles of transparency,
accountability and business integrity in all its dealings with stakeholders.
The group endorses and supports the Code of Corporate Practices and Conduct
contained in the King Committee Report on Corporate Governance (King ll).
Following the publication of this report in March 2002, a comprehensive
implementation plan was developed and the directors believe that the group
is now substantially compliant with King ll.
While adherence to the King ll recommendations can be viewed as a regulatory
requirement, the group recognises its responsibility and the benefits
that can flow from good corporate citizenship. Accordingly the group measures
not only its financial performance, but also its non-financial performance,
aiming to achieve a balance of integrated economic, social and environmental
performance (the so-called triple bottom line). More details are contained
in the Corporate Citizenship report on page
44.
As the group continually strives to improve corporate governance standards,
areas requiring further enhancement will be addressed in the 2004 financial
year. This process is monitored by the recently constituted board sub-committee
on corporate governance.
In line with the recommendations of King ll, the board is reviewing its
charter which outlines the duties, responsibilities and accountability
of the board members collectively, as well as the roles of individual
directors.
Board of directors
The board of directors of New Clicks Holdings retains overall accountability
for the company, its strategy and the annual business plan. It is also
ultimately responsible for legislative and regulatory compliance, risk
management, performance measurement, transparency and communication with
stakeholders.
Authority has been delegated to the group leader, other executive directors
and senior management for the day-to-day management of the company and
the directors are kept appraised of progress through regular reporting
at board meetings.
Key features of the board, its composition and further steps being taken
to comply with the guidelines of King ll, are as follows:
- The board is a unitary body comprising three executive directors and
four non-executive directors. Three of the non-executive directors,
including the chairman and deputy chairman, are deemed to be independent
in terms of the King ll definition. The fourth non-executive director,
Allen Zimbler, provides professional services to the group on a contractual
basis on behalf of Investec Bank.
- The composition of the board is currently being reviewed to align
the group more closely with the guidelines of King ll. The appointment
of further independent non-executive directors will also provide additional
resources for board sub-committees and enhance diversity at board level.
- The roles of the non-executive chairman, David Nurek, and the chief
executive, Trevor Honneysett, are separate, with a clear distinction
of responsibilities.
- The board has no controlling shareholder or group of shareholders,
and there is no specific minority shareholder representation on the
board.
- The non-executive directors have extensive business experience across
a diverse range of sectors, enabling them to provide relevant and independent
advice and judgement in the decision-making process.
- Newly-appointed directors participate in a formal induction programme
which outlines their fiduciary duties and provides them with an in-depth
understanding of the company and its operations.
- Directors do not have a fixed term of appointment, and one-third of
the directors are required to retire by rotation each year and are eligible
for re-election by shareholders at the annual general meeting. Executive
directors retire from the board at 65 years of age, while there is no
prescribed retirement age for non-executive directors.
- An annual self-assessment review process has been developed for the
board, individual directors and board sub-committees, and will be implemented
during the forthcoming year.
- All directors have access to the advice and services of the company
secretary and are entitled to seek independent professional advice at
the company’s expense. They also have unrestricted access to all
company information, records, documents and property.
- The board meets at least four times a year, and additional meetings
can be convened at short notice to consider specific business.
Biographical information on all directors appears on page
9.
Board committees
The board of directors has delegated specific responsibilities to sub-committees
which are all chaired by independent non-executive directors. Audit and
remuneration committees have been functioning for several years, and during
the year a governance committee was established. The board has also approved
the appointment of a nominations committee and a risk management committee
which will be constituted during the coming year. All board sub-committees
have specific terms of reference.
Audit committee
The board entrusts the audit committee to ensure that management has created
and maintained an effective control environment in the group.
The committee consists of three independent non-executive directors and
met twice during the year. Executive management, internal audit and the
external audit partners and staff attend meetings at the invitation of
the committee. The internal audit manager has unrestricted access to the
chairman of the audit committee.
The role of the audit committee is to
– Review and approve the appropriateness of accounting and disclosure
policies in the annual financial statements;
– Assess the effectiveness of internal controls;
– Review action taken on major accounting issues; and
– Ensure that management imposes no limitation on the scope of
the audits.
Remuneration committee
Composed entirely of independent non-executive directors, the committee
determines the broad remuneration philosophy for the group, as well as
determining the remuneration of executive directors and senior management.
It also proposes fees for non-executive directors, which are then tabled
for approval at the annual general meeting.
The committee also assesses and reviews remuneration policies, employee
share incentive schemes, performance bonuses and service contracts.
The chief executive attends meetings at the invitation of the committee
but is not entitled to vote on any issues and does not participate in
discussions regarding his own remuneration.
Governance committee
The increasing focus on corporate governance, transparency and accountability
was the motivation for the creation of a dedicated governance committee
during the year.
The committee’s role is to ensure compliance in both substance
and form with the recommendations of the King Report and to monitor governance
practices throughout the group.
The committee comprises the chairman of the board, the chief executive
officer, the head of finance (South Africa) and the company secretary.
Risk management committee
While the board has approved the formation of a risk management committee,
this body will only be formally constituted during this year.
The mandate of the committee will be to ensure material compliance with
the principles of risk management as outlined in King ll.
The committee will consist of two non-executive directors and key members
of operational management.
Nominations committee
The board has also constituted a nominations committee with effect from
the current year which consists of the chairman and two non-executive
directors.
The committee is mandated by the board to identify suitable candidates
for directorships, and make recommendations to the board. It will also
advise on the composition of the board, and the balance between executive
and non-executive directors. It will advise the board on succession planning,
particularly in relation to the chief executive and senior executive management.
Board attendance
The attendance of the directors at board meetings and sub-committee meetings
for the year is detailed in the table below.
Board remuneration
Remuneration policy
New Clicks strives to employ high calibre individuals who subscribe to
the company’s values and are committed to delivering sustainable
long-term performance. The ability to attract, retain and motivate staff
in the competitive retail environment is an ongoing challenge, where remuneration
plays a key role.
Executive directors and senior management are rewarded with an annual
package, variable performance-related bonus and ownership through participation
in the share incentive scheme.
The board believes that in line with international norms, an increasing
portion of executive directors’ and senior management’s remuneration
should be linked to variable pay as opposed to guaranteed salary.
The fixed portion of the package should allow the group to remain competitive
in the marketplace and reflect the individual’s responsibility and
performance. The incentive-based, variable remuneration should allow for
substantial wealth creation but at all times align the interests of executive
directors and senior management with those of shareholders.
The individual salary, incentive and benefits of the executive directors
and senior management are reviewed annually to ensure that they are appropriately
rewarded for their contribution to the group.
Directors’ shareholdings
The direct and indirect holdings and transactions of the directors of
New Clicks Holdings for the year ended 31 August 2003 are set out in the
table below. All transactions were conducted at the ruling market price
on the JSE Securities Exchange South Africa.
Board attendance
The attendance of the directors at board and sub-committee meetings for
the year were as follows:
| |
Board |
Audit
committee |
Remuneration
committee |
Governance
committee |
| Number of meetings |
5 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
| Directors |
|
|
|
|
| David Nurek 1,2,3 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
| Peter Swartz 1,2 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
n/a |
| Eliot Osrin 1,2 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
n/a |
| Allen Zimbler |
4 |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
| Trevor Honneysett 3 |
5 |
n/a |
n/a |
3 |
| Raymond Godfrey |
5 |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
| Peter Green * 3 |
2 |
n/a |
n/a |
2 |
| Jeff Sher |
4 |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 1 – Member of the Audit committee |
3 – Member of the Governance committee |
| 2 – Member of the Remuneration committee |
* Resigned from the board on 17 June 2003 |
Directors’ remuneration
The following payments were made to directors for the year ended 31 August
2003 (R’000):
| Executive directors |
Salary |
Bonus |
** Total other
benefits |
Total
2003 |
Total
2002 |
| Trevor Honneysett |
2 483 |
152 |
1 077 |
3 712 |
4 366 |
| Raymond Godfrey |
1 428 |
190 |
751 |
2 369 |
2 803 |
| Peter Green * |
1 325 |
169 |
*** 8 190 |
9 684 |
2 586 |
| Jeff Sher (Australia) |
2 707 |
32 |
632 |
3 371 |
5 073 |
| Total |
7 943 |
543 |
10 650 |
19 136 |
14 828 |
* Resigned from
the board on 17 June 2003
** Includes the benefit of interest-free loans from the
New Clicks Holdings Share Trust
*** Includes R7.5 million which is the present value of the
amounts payable to Peter Green on his resignation |
| Non-Executive directors |
|
Directors’ fees |
Consultancy fees |
Total
2003 |
Total
2002 |
| David Nurek |
|
220 |
– |
220 |
192 |
| Peter Swartz |
|
165 |
– |
165 |
90 |
| Eliot Osrin |
|
155 |
– |
155 |
53 |
| Allen Zimbler |
|
125 |
**** 500 |
625 |
53 |
| Total |
|
665 |
500 |
1 165 |
388 |
**** Allen Zimbler provides strategic
planning consultancy services to the group on a contractual basis
and the fees for these services are paid to
Investec Bank |
| Transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
| Director |
Transaction
date |
Average price
per share |
Number of
shares |
Nature of
transaction |
Interest |
| Raymond Godfrey |
17/01/2003 |
R6.50 |
914 000 |
Sale |
Indirect beneficial |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Shareholdings |
|
|
|
|
| Director |
Held through Share Trust |
Direct |
Indirect |
Total |
| Trevor Honneysett |
701 525 |
5 280 |
2 262 840 |
2 969 645 |
| Raymond Godfrey |
545 937 |
2 209 |
416 318 |
964 464 |
| Jeff Sher |
– |
– |
– |
– |
| David Nurek |
– |
29 682 |
– |
29 682 |
| Peter Swartz |
– |
– |
– |
– |
| Eliot Osrin |
– |
135 413 |
– |
135 413 |
| Allen Zimbler |
75 000 |
– |
– |
75 000 |
| Total |
1 322 462 |
172 584 |
2 679 158 |
4 174 204 |
| Issued shares |
|
|
|
354 118 432 |
| Percentage of issued share capital |
|
|
|
1.2% |
| Share options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Date granted |
Issue
price |
Trevor
Honneysett |
Raymond
Godfrey |
Jeff
Sher |
Allen
Zimbler |
David
Nurek |
Peter
Swartz |
Total |
| October 1998 |
R3.50 |
450 000 |
300 000 |
– |
99 300 |
– |
– |
849 300 |
| January 1999 |
R5.35 |
3 150 000 |
2 100 000 |
– |
481 700 |
1 000 000 |
750 000 |
7 481 700 |
| July 1999 |
R7.80 |
600 000 |
400 000 |
500 000 |
– |
– |
– |
1 500 000 |
| September 2000 |
R9.30 |
750 000 |
500 000 |
500 000 |
250 000 |
500 000 |
– |
2 500 000 |
| April 2001 |
R7.40 |
750 000 |
500 000 |
500 000 |
150 000 |
– |
– |
1 900 000 |
| Total |
|
5 700 000 |
3 800 000 |
1 500 000 |
981 000 |
1 500 000 |
750 000 |
14 231 000 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accountability and audit
Risk management
The board is responsible for setting risk policies, risk tolerance and
risk management processes in the group.
Business continuity plans for the head office and distribution centres
have been documented and are regularly reviewed. The disaster recovery
plan will ensure that the business continues with the least amount of
disruption, both operationally and from an information technology perspective,
with procedures in place to resume computer operations at off-site third
party premises. Testing of the business continuity plans and disaster
recovery plans is an ongoing process.
Details of foreign exchange, credit and interest risk are contained in
note
27 on page 79 of the financial statements.
Internal audit
Internal audit is an independent, objective appraisal and assurance function
and forms a core element of the group’s corporate governance structures.
The internal audit function reports to the audit committee and has the
support of the board and management. Operationally, the internal audit
manager reports to the head of finance, South Africa, who in turn reports
to the chief executive. The procedure for the appointment and dismissal
of the internal audit manager is in line with other executive positions,
and would need to be sanctioned by the audit committee.
Internal audit includes the review of the effectiveness of the systems
of internal control, the means of safeguarding assets, the reliability
and integrity of financial and operating information, the efficient management
of the group’s resources and the efficient conduct of its operations.
Internal control
The board is responsible for the group’s systems of internal control
which are designed to provide reasonable – but not absolute –
assurance against inaccurate internal financial information and other
irregularities. The audit committee has reviewed the effectiveness of
the systems of internal control and the board has been satisfied that
management has established a system of controls and procedures of a high
standard to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the accounting records
and to effectively monitor the group’s businesses and their performance.
No incidents have come to the attention of the board that would indicate
any material breakdown in these internal controls during the year.
Financial statements
The directors accept ultimate responsibility for the preparation of the
financial statements and related financial information that fairly represent
the state of affairs and the results of the group.
The financial statements have been prepared by management in accordance
with South African Statements of Generally Accepted Accounting Practice.
They incorporate full and reasonable disclosure and are based on appropriate
accounting policies that are supported by reasonable and prudent judgements
and estimates. The views of investors have been taken into account in
determining the content and presentation of the annual report.
The external auditors are responsible for independently auditing and
reporting on these financial statements in conformance with Statements
of South African Auditing Standards.
Going concern
The directors are satisfied that the group has adequate resources to continue
operating for the next 12 months and into the foreseeable future. The
financial statements presented on pages 52
to 88 have accordingly been prepared
on a going concern basis.
Personal share dealings
Directors and staff are restricted from trading in the shares of New Clicks
Holdings during two formalised closed periods. These closed periods run
from the end of the interim and annual reporting periods until the financial
results are announced on the Securities Exchange News Service (SENS).
Embargoes may also be placed on share dealings should the group be involved
in corporate activity which results in the directors and executives having
access to price-sensitive information. The company secretary advises all
directors and employees prior to the start of the closed periods of the
prohibitions contained in the Insider Trading Act.
All directors are required to obtain written clearance from the chairman
or deputy chairman prior to dealing in the company’s shares. It
is also mandatory to notify the company secretary of any dealings in the
company’s shares and this information is then disclosed to the Listings
Division of the JSE Securities Exchange within 48 hours of the trade being
made. These dealings are also disclosed at the quarterly board meetings.
Ethics and values
All employees are required to maintain the highest ethical standards of
business practice. The group has adopted a set of values and behavioural
principles (outlined on page
3) which require staff to display honesty, integrity, mutual respect,
openness and affords them the right and obligation to challenge others
who are not adhering to these values. These values are shared with all
new staff as part of the formal induction programme, and staff give an
undertaking to abide by the values. When staff act outside of the spirit
of these values, the matter is investigated and dealt with by an appropriate
executive who is empowered to recommend disciplinary action depending
on the transgression.
|